|
|
|
Newest employment law cases Summaries and links to full text |
Emailed directly to you and online all the time |
|
United States Supreme Court Employment Law Cases
All pending employment law cases - click here |
Kloeckner v. Solis
(11-184)
HELD: MSPB "mixed case"
appeals are filed in district court, not in the Federal Circuit
Decided December 10, 2012
[Full text opinion]
|
|
Kloeckner complained that her employer, the
Department of Labor, had engaged in age and sex discrimination. While her
complaint was pending at EEOC, DOL discharged her. Because Kloeckner believed
that DOL's decision to fire her was based on unlawful discrimination, she now
had a "mixed case." She then took her case to the Merit Systems
Protection Board (MSPB), but MSPB dismissed her appeal as untimely. Kloeckner
then sued in federal district court. That court dismissed the complaint, holding
that - because MSPB had not decided Kloeckner's case on the merits - her only
avenue of appeal was to the Federal Circuit; the 8th Circuit affirmed.
The US Supreme Court unanimously
reversed, holding that a federal employee who claims that an agency action
appealable to the MSPB violates an antidiscrimination statute listed in §7702(a)(1)
should seek judicial review in district court, not the Federal Circuit,
regardless whether the MSPB decided her case on procedural grounds or on the
merits.
Case below: Kloechner
v. Solis (8th Cir 05/13/2011)
Questions presented in petition for certiorari:
The
Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) is authorized to hear appeals by federal
employees regarding certain adverse actions, such as dismissals. If in such an
appeal the employee asserts that the challenged action was the result of
unlawful discrimination, that claim is referred to as a "mixed
case." The
Question Presented is:
Briefs on the merits:
Certiorari Documents:
Counsel:
|
|