|
|
Karen Wilson was an employee of the Graham
County Soil and Water Conservation District. She brought a qui tam suit under
the federal False Claims Act against various entities alleging that they had
made false claims against the United States. In a qui tam action an individual
sues in the name of the United States and is allowed to keep a portion of the
proceeds. However, there must not have been a prior public disclosure of the
information of alleged wrongdoing that forms the basis of the suit. If there has
been a prior public disclosure of information in an “administrative ... report
... audit, or investigation,” then the district court lacks jurisdiction over
the case.
The issue in this case is the scope of
the "public disclosure" jurisdictional bar contained in the False
Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-33. The district court concluded that certain
audits and reports issued by state and local governmental entities satisfied the
requirements of the public disclosure bar and therefore deprived the district
court of subject matter jurisdiction. The 4th Circuit concluded that the public
disclosure bar applies to federal administrative audits, reports, hearings or
investigations, but not to those conducted or issued by a state or local
governmental entity.
This issue has
divided the circuit courts. The US Supreme Court granted certiorari to review
the judgment of the 4th Circuit.
Case below: United
States ex rel. Wilson v. Graham County Soil & Water Conservation
District, 528
F.3d 292 (4th Cir 06/09/2008)
Official docket sheet
Certiorari granted June 22, 2009.
Oral argument:
November 30, 2009. The Solicitor General participates in oral
argument in this case.
Question presented:
Whether an audit and investigation performed by a State or its political
subdivision constitutes an "administrative . . . report . . . audit, or
investigation" within the meaning of the public disclosure jurisdictional bar of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C.
§ 3730(e)(4)(A).
Certiorari Documents:
Briefs on the merits:
- Brief
for Petitioner Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District, et
al.
- Brief
for Respondent U.S. ex rel. Karen T. Wilson
- Reply
Brief for Petitioner Graham County Soil & Water Conservation
District, et al.
- Brief
for the States of Pennsylvania, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado,
Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas,
Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nebraska, New Hampshire,
New Jersey, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina,
Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming in Support of
Petitioner
- Brief
for The National League of Cities, U.S. Conference of Mayors, Government
Finance Officers Association, the National Association of Counties, the
International City/County Management Association, and the International
Municipal Lawyers Association in Support of Petitioner
- Brief
for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, The
American Health Care Association, the Pharmaceutical Research and
Manufacturers of America, and the American Hospital Association in
Support of Petitioner
- Brief
for Washington Legal Foundation and Allied Educational Foundation in
Support of Petitioner Brief
for the American Center for Law and Justice in Support of Respondent
- Brief
for the United States of America in Support of Respondent
- Brief
for the Taxpayers Against Fraud Education Fund in Support of Respondent
- Brief
for the American Center for Law and Justice in Support of Respondent
Counsel:
-
For Petitioners: Christopher G. Browning Jr.; North Carolina
Department of Justice; P.O. Box 629; Raleigh, NC 27602; CBrowning@ncdoj.gov;
(919) 716-6900.
-
For Respondent: Mark T. Hurt; 159 West Main Street; Abingdon, VA 24210;
(276) 623-0808.
|
|